Snakes on a Wii Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 53 Joined: 09/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 How is that a responsible response? You can multiple a variety of any two numbers to get 42, its not too special, but nice try But dude, it's 13.37. This is proof of the existence of a leet god Link to comment
SilentGuns Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 4799 Joined: 08/14/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 Wait, you don't think it's funny, so you want to ban him? Because theres funny and then there is retarded funny. Link to comment
Snakes on a Wii Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 53 Joined: 09/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 you guys are just mad because you didn't think of this first lol Link to comment
Snakes on a Wii Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 53 Joined: 09/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 Because theres funny and then there is retarded funny. So there are two classes of funny, is that it? Separate but equal? Link to comment
tinkerbell Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 1662 Joined: 05/16/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 close enough when dealing in mathamatic "close enough" is still WRONG so like i say again, your argument is fail Link to comment
XeNo Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 6466 Joined: 07/22/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 yea , just give him a forum ban... Every time I see you make a post like this, I laugh at the irony. Link to comment
Snakes on a Wii Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 53 Joined: 09/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 when dealing in mathamatic "close enough" is still WRONG so like i say again, your argument is fail Well ofc it won't be exactly 42, because a rational numbers are closed under multiplication, and the irrational numbers don't map to rational numbers under multiplication. So you can't take an irrational number and multiply it by any other number to get a rational one. I dare you to try though. Link to comment
tinkerbell Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 1662 Joined: 05/16/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 Well ofc it won't be exactly 42, because a rational numbers are closed under multiplication, and the irrational numbers don't map to rational numbers under multiplication. So you can't take an irrational number and multiply it by any other number to get a rational one. I dare you to try though. L O L i do have a BSc in the subject so Pshhh Link to comment
CandleJack Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 2632 Joined: 11/03/08 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 Link to comment
tinkerbell Posted October 4, 2009 Content Count: 1662 Joined: 05/16/07 Status: Offline Share Posted October 4, 2009 [OMG]http://i628.photobucket.com/albums/uu2/Kerom/Facepalm.jpg[/img] LOL FAIL Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread