Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Is a French Fry A Vegetable?  

64 members have voted

  1. 1. Is a French Fry A Vegetable?

    • Yes = Vegetable
      32
    • No = Not A Vegetable
      32

Is a French Fry A Vegetable?

Recommended Posts


  • Content Count:  11501
  • Joined:  10/19/08
  • Status:  Offline

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a federal judge, batter-coated french fries are considered a fresh vegetable. The new classification applies only to commerce: not nutrition.

 

/thread

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  1938
  • Joined:  09/15/07
  • Status:  Offline

In mathematics, a binary relation R over a set X is transitive if whenever an element a is related to an element b, and b is in turn related to an element c, then a is also related to c.

 

Transitivity is a key property of both partial order relations and equivalence relations.

 

Examples

For example, "is greater than," "is at least as great as," and "is equal to" (equality) are transitive relations:

 

whenever A > B and B > C, then also A > C

whenever A ≥ B and B ≥ C, then also A ≥ C

whenever A = B and B = C, then also A = C

For some time, economists and philosophers believed that preference was a transitive relation; however, there are now mathematical theories that demonstrate that preferences and other significant economic results can be modeled without resorting to this assumption[citation needed].

 

On the other hand, "is the mother of" is not a transitive relation, because if Alice is the mother of Brenda, and Brenda is the mother of Claire, then Alice is not always the mother of Claire. What is more, it is antitransitive: Alice can never be the mother of Claire.

 

Then again, in biology we often need to consider motherhood over an arbitrary number of generations: the relation "is a matrilinear ancestor of". This is a transitive relation. More precisely, it is the transitive closure of the relation "is the mother of".

 

More examples of transitive relations:

 

"is a subset of" (set inclusion)

"divides" (divisibility)

"implies" (implication)

 

The converse of a transitive relation is always transitive: e.g. knowing that "is a subset of" is transitive and "is a superset of" is its converse, we can conclude that the latter is transitive as well.

 

The intersection of two transitive relations is always transitive: knowing that "was born before" and "has the same first name as" are transitive, we can conclude that "was born before and also has the same first name as" is also transitive.

 

The union of two transitive relations is not always transitive. For instance "was born before or has the same first name as" is not generally a transitive relation.

 

The complement of a transitive relation is not always transitive. For instance, while "equal to" is transitive, "not equal to" is only transitive on sets with at most two elements.

 

well, your an ass

Link to comment

Reply to Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...