starbucks Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 1571 Joined: 02/19/09 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 i lol'd youre not the only one. Link to comment
Drox Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 8383 Joined: 12/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 Do you have the majority of the ca's to confirm what you were told is the truth? How when only 4 were not afk and only 2 voted? lol I think I can trust the said person since they have no reason to lie. lol Link to comment
'BEANIE Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 894 Joined: 02/24/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 I'm not going to turn into the sort person that blocks all sort of outside chat, i have no problems talking to people when they need help. What does bug me is that people message me when i'm game, i'm not going to be inclined to help them. Especially if they bother me in the next 20 minutes, i would get pissed if i get tabbed and get ganked in a game of LoL. If you're not gonna block people from communicating when you're in game then you have to expect that people are gonna PM you, especially if you're a CA+. Link to comment
Farmer Mick Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 1842 Joined: 07/25/07 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 How when only 4 were not afk and only 2 voted? lol I think I can trust the said person since they have no reason to lie. lol see this is the thing 5 CA's VOTED to remove the said players. The CA protocol was followed [5+ CA's have to be agreed for a motion to be carried] Link to comment
rusty Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 73 Joined: 08/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 if 1 CA tells you 1 thing the other CA's could say another it could be a CA with a big stiring spoon. Link to comment
Metal Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 11725 Joined: 09/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 This is stupid..... Why take it away from him for not being active. At least he is trying to become a admin. Harp does have a life you know. 1 Link to comment
Drox Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 8383 Joined: 12/17/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 see this is the thing 5 CA's VOTED to remove the said players. The CA protocol as said in jager's post was followed I'll leave it at that, I talked to who I needed to talk to share with my concerns. Link to comment
P3rg3 Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 1484 Joined: 06/18/08 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 If you're not gonna block people from communicating when you're in game then you have to expect that people are gonna PM you, especially if you're a CA+. This. I thought it was part of being CA? see this is the thing 5 CA's VOTED to remove the said players. The CA protocol as said in jager's post was followed 5 CA's, out of how many? Link to comment
rusty Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 73 Joined: 08/30/07 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 This is stupid..... Why take it away from him for not being active. At least he is trying to become a admin. Harp does have a life you know. if harp has a life then what about CAs. CAs dont have a life and are on every sunday for a meeting... Link to comment
SgtJoo Posted May 26, 2010 Content Count: 2034 Joined: 03/02/10 Status: Offline Share Posted May 26, 2010 If CAs can vote to remove inactive SG-As, why can't higher than CAs vote to remove inactive CAs? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread