XeNo

I don't see you having access to view our forums, nor in our meetings. I don't see you being a higher up (which by the way, us CA's have no rights to remove one of our own, only higher ups do) so what I DO see is you just complaining to complain without any real proof of what's going on. We brought up the fact we have inactive CA's at last meeting, it was also put in the higher up Agenda to discuss inactive CA's.

People are people, rank doesn't change tolerance levels, Rusty was harsh, going to cry about it? Honestly saying 'fuck off I'm busy' is hardly a huge disrespect issue. I have to tell Harpreet to shut the fuck up CONSTANTLY whenever I DO happen to see him, cause he just sits in the server screaming in his mic for 30 minutes or until he leaves. I've muted him more times than I can count. Sometimes he doesn't even notice he's muted. If he can't handle being told to 'fuck off', then he's the one bitching and moaning.

It's already been talked about. We're working on more ideas to make it so more CA's are involved, but in the end it's people we trust to be CA's vs activity. We'd like both but it's just not going to happen with every CA. When majority of people are saying to remove someone, and some say they don't care either way, I'm going to assume they will go with majority ruling. SA's are higher ups to regular players and you guys don't treat them with respect 24/7. If you honestly say you've never told a player to shut the fuck up I'd just laugh. Rusty telling another person to fuck off he's busy and them getting upset and sad is just depressing.

So basically, you're taking two words from a CA not involved in any way with the decisions (Rusty is not active in CA section as much as most) and taking away from that, that the community has a problem with not helping people. That's cool. Rusty is a CA, hardly a higher up. We have the same abilities as SA's, the only thing we have more than most SA's is our own forum, talk with the higher ups, and decide on apprentices. It's not like just cause we get promoted we suddenly have a higher tolerance level for annoying bullshit.

Rusty saying fuck off and a higher up saying 'ask so and so' achieves the same thing to both. You stop talking to them.

How often do you pm a BD and they help you even though they're on? That's why I think your question was dumb, cause not even most of the higher ups don't bother to help when they're busy. Adviser to higher ups, not to deal with rulings he didn't even take part in.

I DUNNO, LETS ASK BD'S SAME QUESTION, LUL. You're an idiot if you think just cause someone's a higher up they'll devote every second of their online free-time to helping someone. It's not like Rusty's the only goddamn CA. You heard wrong, both of you. It was 5 out of 6 who voted to remove and no one was 'afk' or anything. One person voted to keep JMD, the rest found him annoying and apparently inactive. Cause they have lives? Or jobs? or emergencies? Or it's like 2am when the meeting is where they live? We try to encourage more to join, but when they don't we have to make do with who's there. Sounds like whoever you talked to is an idiot. Probably shouldn't trust what they say. I can name all the CA's who voted to remove him or said 'alright we'll remove him'. Probably whoever you talked to was the one person at the meeting who was 'zoning us out' and constantly saying 'fine I don't care'. 5 CA's out of 6 at the meeting. If a CA didn't make the meeting, well sucks to be them. They can't voice an opinion if they don't post in applicant threads/be at the meeting. We're currently deciding whether or not to start making a thread three-five days before meetings to discuss people we would like to promote/remove from the program. I personally don't see how it will work well in the long run, but it's the higher up's suggestion to solve from further people being removed who don't deserve to be removed. Zaraki was removed for inactivity because telling him he's an annoying disrespectful antagonist seemed a bit harsh. Harpreet was removed because no one had seen him outside of occasionally screaming on his mic in TTT for 30mins straight then leaving. You people still fail to realize that Higher Ups are at this meeting too, while only 6 CA's may have voted, there was upwards of 10 different opinions being thrown in or decided upon. HighSky and Jager seem to be at the meetings most of the time, along with TCP and other BD's or AO's. So it's not just us CA's that have opinions and input into decisions. We're just the ones who vote for which way we feel fit.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. This guy. This guy right here.

In Africa, I'd say the kids.

Not a voice changer.

Beth!

You make a favoritism poll and expect girls to not be favorites? What are you, gay?

Beta isn't 1.0, genius. Honestly, you're an idiot.

First, why would you expect guns to constantly be accurate? Even in MW2 the guns don't CONSTANTLY go in a direct line with the reticule. Second, you're an idiot. CS came out in beta in 1999, 2000 it went CS 1.0 and began upgrading from there. If you want realism, join the army or something. I can list endlessly about how CS:S isn't realistic at all. Comparing 'realism' in games is to just complain.

0071WOxBOXY

CS 1.0 came out in 2000. CS Source isn't CS 2.0. MW2 is a great game, it's a good shooter, it's not my style, doesn't mean it isn't a great game with awesome graphics. CSS was never realistic. Don't even get started. The most realistic thing about CS:S is the gun looks. Guns in real life being used by actual Marines/Rangers will not have much recoil cause they can control their spread by holding the weapon correctly. As for your comment on the reticule in CS:S, it's actually pretty accurate, then again you're bad as CS:S so I don't expect you to know that. 5 man squads are generally what get sent in to deal with a situation, especially one where it's terrorists planning to bomb a building or artifacts, they don't waste the resources of 200 men to take out 5 terrorists. I don't know what logic you use, but if you send some men to take out a terrorist situation, generally by the time you realize they need backup, the terrorists have already planted their bomb and gotten out of there or rigged it to blow already. It's not a 'Awww shucks, we didn't get those pesky terrorists today but we'll get them tomorrow' thing. As for your obvious inaccuracy about spread, it's never that bad except in the air and rarely while strafing. Otherwise if you're standing still, a footshot will never be a headshot. ------------------------------------------ Now for the update, it looks good, they're headed in a better direction without really changing any main mechanics of the game. They've already stated the 'ice skating' feel of movement and making sound when you move your crosshair is in the process of being fixed, aside from that they've removed interp issues, which is FUCKING AWESOME, because the way it is now, a person can actually peek you and see you before you see them, depending on angle. It will also fix registry errors in a way as well. Hitboxes have been updated vastly as well. Honestly you guys in this thread are fucking stupid if you think this update is bad. At first glance with the movement issues it is, aside from that they've updated: Graphics Smoothness Hitboxes Registry Interp Which is all fucking cool shit. The only need to fix the scoreboard, and the movement issues and the whole thing will be a huge improvement on CS:S. From a Reg CS:S standpoint. They also have grenades coming out of your body at a different direction, which probably will be weird to get used to, but they do same damage and bounce the same way so probably will just take a little adjusting.

0071WOxBOXY

haHXgFU7qNI

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO WAVENNNNNNNNNNNNN

I voted for all of them, though honorable mentions go to lux astrum broncoty repeat and juku.

This thread is incredibly retarded.

I haven't bothered, nor cared about this since it happened which was...months ago? I honestly don't see 'a lot' of threads about it or 'a lot' of talking about it. I liked Paladin, Matt I always thought was a bit whiny, turns out it appears to hold true. You brought up an OLD topic, didn't have the balls to name the people who are allowed to play freely when you seem to think they're just as guilty as you. Any normal person would have just said names, but then again, that would make you look bad. (Then again you did idiotically give someone the rcon password so I can't put it past you to be an idiot by not naming people who supposedly were also in it.) I sense someone is starved for attention.

I didn't do that and you still didn't get longer than me I think. Lol.