Jump to content

? servers

? players online

Bullet Wound

Legend
  • Posts

    2390
  • Joined

Everything posted by Bullet Wound

  1. Sup Brah?
  2. But Haggard says in his original post they will meet weekly and do a vote on who gets promoted. Or will it be more like: after the first month of this is done, they will meet weekly and each week promote someone/multiple people who have been in the program for over a month and that they feel are ready.
  3. Yes, if you do a donation of at least $20 you have a supporter status FOR LIFE. No need to continually give each month to keep the status, you have it forever. However don't let that stop you from continuing to donate
  4. How many admins will be promoted to full admin each week? Will it be all that they feel are ready, or is there a capped limit? Also, do Apprentices get access to the SA forum section, or do they need to be a full admin for that?
  5. + Rep (Don't ban me!)

  6. Cause only a dumbass pays for what he can get for free.
  7. Buy a rabbit.
  8. anti-freeze, I hear it taste good.
  9. *Counts using fingers..... Whats with all the people from '08 talking about how great an idea an idea it is and how they want it back, hes talking about '07. But hey what the hell, I'm with yah
  10. if the admin is you than no reason is need, and I won't say bye, cause being scarce isn't leaving and TBH no thread was needed. So Picture time! Oh right thread was made by lelouch.....oh well picture still works.
  11. I think its how well known he player actually is rather than the amount of time they've been an admin, but I see your point. Having a rule about would be nice to have something to fall back on in order to judge abuse, however the only reason it should be there is for the player's knowledge, as the admins should already know that in order to alert the gameplay you need the server to back you up. Something simple like this would probably be fine: *An admin must have at least 90/95% of the servers agreement in order to carry out any admin powers used for the fun of the server and its players
  12. Two posts about her as opposed to about 7 on topic, down dog.
  13. Since when is Beth sweet? lol i know it can be played without help from the admin and still be fun, i suppose fun was the wrong word, maybe if i had said unique or something along those lines. Within the idea of it being fun, but different from the usually gameplay. And TBH, I was only admin for a month and I kinda figured the only way to do something unique (the word im using for fun) was to do a vote first and see if it was actually wanted. Length of time being here really won't change how a person is an admin, they either can do it right, or they can't. But yea, they should be all be informed on that kind of stuff, all though its pretty comon sense.
  14. Poor Rusty

    British people sound so funny lol
  15. Thats just cause they let beth get away with anything.
  16. I agree for the most part that when I play a game I don't want the admins to fuck it up, however that being said I have no problem if an admin does something for one or two rounds. Quite frankly anyone who gets butthurt over 1-2 rounds of shenanigans is obviously just pissed about something IRL or just generally a douch. You shouldn't need a policy, admins should be choosen as such you be able to trust them fully (or at least mostly) in the servers to keep the "peace" and to make their own decisions as to what is done in order to make the game enjoyable for all players. And TBH making a rule about when to have fun in a game kinda defeats the purpose of playing the game. Ok What I want from the admins: Be able to trust them and their judgment Biggest problem I see is that since so many admins are being accepted with so little known about them (say what you want but I see many admins vote yes because "I have seen you a few times and you have not broken the rules"), additional rules are needed in order to keep them in line. All of these issues could be avoided if we could just trust the admins to regulate the servers, no need for legislation or rules or whatever, just trust. The selection of AOs is more extensive than the selection of SAs, so in short, because they trust them more, they allow them to get away with little things because in the end they know that they are not bad.
  17. How does it take you 17 hours to realize you suck at a game?
  18. Personally if I was on the ship, I would have found it more funny if you had just flown around, rather than going out of no clip. Also your motivation IS an important part in order to judge the outcome, if the intent was seen as good fun for all, this may have been taken differently.
  19. In all fairness most people use their main hand, and some use both
  20. I agree with everything expect for this: You can't honestly sit there and say you no-clipped YOURSELF, for the good of EVERYONE, it just doesn't match. It WAS for your own self-interest. That being said you are right in your own way, the round had effectively "ended" after the humans escaped, and the humans won the match. Although you noclipped, got someone, and the entire team turned into zombies. It was still considered a Human victory, and therefore the game play of the round was not altered (seeing as it was already over). Why a strike was given I will never know, until someone decides to bitch at me and tell me why.
  21. No u are not. Everyone is so evil with their plans as president, im never voting for any of you....
  22. What Lux said, having sensitive info, than choosing the other place, than exploiting the info. Pretty much any scenario where you'd have to choose one over the other. Comes back to my other point, how do you know if they are high up in another community Lux?
  23. One of these are not like the others, not like the others...do do do.... Better poems then what i could do.
  24. Um, order the military back? And then make them dance
  25. But....how would we know unless they told us in the first place? I see nothing wrong with it, so long as they don't affect each other.
×
×
  • Create New...