Italian Jew Posted November 21, 2008 Content Count: 4473 Joined: 11/26/07 Status: Offline Share Posted November 21, 2008 But players all agree on these and follow it Simon says IS against the rules actually... The terrorists have the option of playing, if they choose not to then they can't be killed for it... That would be killing for NOT wanting to play a game that would result in death anyway If it is Simon Says without the death for the loser, then they have to play it because it is an order. All orders that do not result in the death of the prisoner (if they lose in a race, Simon Says, etc.) should be followed. Quote Link to comment
Axel Posted November 21, 2008 Content Count: 678 Joined: 08/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 21, 2008 If it is Simon Says without the death for the loser, then they have to play it because it is an order. All orders that do not result in the death of the prisoner (if they lose in a race, Simon Says, etc.) should be followed. Well yeah, I know that But the CT's never say if it will result in dying... Quote Link to comment
Lux Posted November 21, 2008 Content Count: 6712 Joined: 03/06/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 21, 2008 Simon says can involve killing if the prisoners except the terms that if they lose they die, otherwise no. Also think about this. If a ct kills a t when no one is looking should he get away with it??? No. Quote Link to comment
Bullet Wound Posted November 21, 2008 Content Count: 2390 Joined: 09/24/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 21, 2008 That's different Lux, the CT is in control or at least should be. If he kills the T who is unarmed for no reason its a free-kill, regardless of where, everyone knows that rule. A T killing a CT is completely different as the Ts are never in control (least not at the start of the round). Also the CTs objective is not to kill the Ts, its to keep them under control, if he kills them for no reason its agasin't his objectives, but for the T it is his goal. All in all you need to see the kill in order for it to be more fair, because if you can kill anyone of them for rebelling with no proof many are going to be a lot less likely to play, making the game boring. Quote Link to comment
Axel Posted November 21, 2008 Content Count: 678 Joined: 08/28/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 21, 2008 maybe so but if no one saw them kill them just because it appears on the top right part of the screen would it pop up in a real prison... hahaha i think it is gay if you all gang raped someone that they can kill the one who did the final blow... you didn't see it could of be anyone!!!! Quote Link to comment
Chef Posted November 22, 2008 Content Count: 350 Joined: 09/02/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 22, 2008 this is becoming stupid. next admin who no clips or whatnot to open the cells, im filing a report against.... because theres no open time in the rules Quote Link to comment
Dracula Posted November 22, 2008 Content Count: 4685 Joined: 03/26/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 22, 2008 this is becoming stupid. next admin who no clips or whatnot to open the cells, im filing a report against.... because theres no open time in the rules make sure to have a demo Quote Link to comment
Lux Posted November 22, 2008 Content Count: 6712 Joined: 03/06/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 22, 2008 make sure to have a demo Yes, but no CTs get punished for not opening it either do they??? If the whole team really want to leave prisoners in their cells, then I think you deserve no better than to be bored wandering why you are so retarded. Many things aren't in the rules, but they still apply. In this case, this is a rule because if it wasn't, no one would play. My argument for you not having to witness people to kill them is that people are moaning about it not being realistic....but look at the whole concept of PrisonBreak, its not in the slightest realistic. You also don't look at why it is unfair on Ts. They aren't in control at all, the Ts are. There are no rules for the Ts to abide by, but the CTs have enough restrictions without having to let rebels stay alive for the sake of trying to be realistic. When you follow this rule Ts will ALWAYS WIN, and to stop this more CTs will camp for minutes on end, because it will be 10 against 1, because ontop of everything, there is always a small ratio of T:CT because hypocrits say "WE NEED CTS" and they wouldn't ever go CT, they'd rather leave the server. Quote Link to comment
Chef Posted November 23, 2008 Content Count: 350 Joined: 09/02/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 23, 2008 Turning deathnotes off is the best solution. If a CT gets caught off gaurd and gets knifed by 3 TERRORISTS the only person the Ct's who didnt witness can get is the one who happened to popup in the notifications. Thats stupid. If he killed him, you should have to see it or atleast brace yourself for him preparing to shoot your ass. Be alert and hold order, dont camp armory or vents... thats what ruins the game. Quote Link to comment
Lux Posted November 23, 2008 Content Count: 6712 Joined: 03/06/08 Status: Offline Share Posted November 23, 2008 Turning deathnotes off is the best solution. If a CT gets caught off gaurd and gets knifed by 3 TERRORISTS the only person the Ct's who didnt witness can get is the one who happened to popup in the notifications. Thats stupid. If he killed him, you should have to see it or atleast brace yourself for him preparing to shoot your ass. Be alert and hold order, dont camp armory or vents... thats what ruins the game. You expect too much of CTs. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread