Petition - Ban against Furry/Porn

[Lux]

Feel free to make a discussion thread connected to this.

 

But to answer your statement, this is what that's about. By removing it, it'll cause anyone who wishes to continue with this stop.

 

It's been more than a week since PotShots thread was read and done with. There have still been instances in which it's causing problems.

There will continue to be problems until something is done.

 

I have a picture of the flaming caused by it, and this happens on a regular basis. I may be banned from the chatbox, but I have friends who use it. They get irritated with it as well. I don't want them to be banned and lose their respect over fighting back against an undefinable war.

 

It's caused problems, and it will continue. And it's only by new members.

 

Those who are furry deserve respect, and that's what we should give them. No. Matter. What.

However, those like -namewitheld- are ruining it for them and are causing serious problems within our community. They're making an awful image for those held dear to us who are furry, but have caused no problems.

 

It's become a stereotype that all furries are like this, and it has to stop one way or another.

 

I think you are highlighting that it isn't furry that that particularly is the problem, more some of the people who are into furry.

 

That would conclude that it is these people who you should be chasing after with player complaints rather then furry as a whole...?

[PotshotPolka]

You are the most pro-dictatorship bastard I have met today, you are insinuating that steamgamers should stop a person from talking about anything furry, wow. While the furry thing is causing alot of drama banning anything furry related in their profile or posts is just going to cause more drama and is borderline idiotic.

 

It's not drama, seeing as how we've already asked politely many times for the issue to be swept under the rug. Now we just want it gone.

[SoulKeeper]

Well, that's completely not fair to those who are furry.

 

If this does get accepted, that would mean we're still allowed to bash furries and they wouldn't be able to defend themselves, this isn't "LOL FURREZ SUK PLZ NO MOAR IF UR FURI" This is also to protect their reputation and sanity.

Once someone finds out your a furry, it gets spread throughout.

If you haven't built up a good enough reputation, you're public enemy number one.

 

This is what happened to Church.

However, it is his fault for advertising it.

 

Also, I'm not an admin. I can't exactly "LOL IF UR POST COMENT N NO SUPRT UR REMOVD MKAEY"

 

That's just insurance, my good friend. IF people do reply, it's been stated they cannot flame or be a dickhole.

[PotshotPolka]

Well, that's completely not fair to those who are furry.

 

If this does get accepted, that would mean we're still allowed to bash furries and they wouldn't be able to defend themselves, this isn't "LOL FURREZ SUK PLZ NO MOAR IF UR FURI" This is also to protect their reputation and sanity.

Once someone finds out your a furry, it gets spread throughout.

If you haven't built up a good enough reputation, you're public enemy number one.

 

This is what happened to Church.

However, it is his fault for advertising it.

 

That has nothing to do with it. Furry shit was an issue before, and alot of members got pissed, the said furries took their shit down, that was the end of it. That is what we want, no more, no less. The shitbag in question though just feeds off this.

[BORN A REBEL]

BORN A REBEL

[Lux]

Well, that's completely not fair to those who are furry.

 

If this does get accepted, that would mean we're still allowed to bash furries and they wouldn't be able to defend themselves, this isn't "LOL FURREZ SUK PLZ NO MOAR IF UR FURI" This is also to protect their reputation and sanity.

Once someone finds out your a furry, it gets spread throughout.

If you haven't built up a good enough reputation, you're public enemy number one.

 

This is what happened to Church.

However, it is his fault for advertising it.

 

Also, I'm not an admin. I can't exactly "LOL IF UR POST COMENT N NO SUPRT UR REMOVD MKAEY"

 

I was saying that it is those who are pressing furry so much onto others that should be dealt with, not anyone who is a "furry".

 

How can banning anything to do with furry protect furries? It's not going to be published everywhere and stop furries posting, it will just get them banned even if they didn't ask for world wide acceptance and keep posting it and bashing people etc.....and I doubt that banning them will really make them feel any better then if they get bashed, infact if it was worse then they would decide to leave without getting banned.....(my defence isn't for those who I have highlighted above though.....the annoying and pushy ones).

[MPQC]

MPQC

[SoulKeeper]

I was saying that it is those who are pressing furry so much onto others that should be dealt with, not anyone who is a "furry".

 

How can banning anything to do with furry protect furries? It's not going to be published everywhere and stop furries posting, it will just get them banned even if they didn't ask for world wide acceptance and keep posting it and bashing people etc.....and I doubt that banning them will really make them feel any better then if they get bashed, infact if it was worse then they would decide to leave without getting banned.....(my defence isn't for those who I have highlighted above though.....the annoying and pushy ones).

 

Say if I was gay, am I allowed to have homosexual men kissing in my avatar and signature, or is that pushing it upon people?

What if two erotic men were holding hands?

Sucking a lolipop in a curious stance?

[PotshotPolka]

Here lets stop the theoretical shit Lux. Longwave and Kenny are fine. I'm not even offended by them in the slightest. Church is a fucking piece of trash, NOT because of his obsession with Fur, but because he thinks he can tote it around here and force us to take it. At this point since the folks in charge can't seem to fucking understand that we've taken it into our own hands, we simply want it gone. We didn't start this, but we will finish it, tonight preferably, without reversal, compromise, or exception.

[Kennith]

Well, that's completely not fair to those who are furry.

 

If this does get accepted, that would mean we're still allowed to bash furries and they wouldn't be able to defend themselves, this isn't "LOL FURREZ SUK PLZ NO MOAR IF UR FURI" This is also to protect their reputation and sanity.

Once someone finds out your a furry, it gets spread throughout.

If you haven't built up a good enough reputation, you're public enemy number one.

 

This is what happened to Church.

However, it is his fault for advertising it.

 

Also, I'm not an admin. I can't exactly "LOL IF UR POST COMENT N NO SUPRT UR REMOVD MKAEY"

 

That's just insurance, my good friend. IF people do reply, it's been stated they cannot flame or be a dickhole.

 

Just because someone is a furry, doesn't mean its required to go and pick on the furry lover. Maybe if you had some self restraint the flames wouldn't have happened. Don't get me wrong, I am all for removing furry content to ever be placed on the site, but IMO it seems you all just need something to bash on, something to flame on, I'm sure after its removed you'll find something else. I've only seen 2 people with content in his avatar and signature, yet you guys act like its the source of all problems and its killing the SG community, the only ones killing the SG community are flamers. Learn to accept.

 

 

Say if I was gay, am I allowed to have homosexual men kissing in my avatar and signature, or is that pushing it upon people?

What if two erotic men were holding hands?

Sucking a lolipop in a curious stance?

 

I haven't seen an avatar like that at all relating to furries, if you had just a man in your avatar that would be fine.

 

Here lets stop the theoretical shit Lux. Longwave and Kenny are fine. I'm not even offended by them in the slightest. Church is a fucking piece of trash, NOT because of his obsession with Fur, but because he thinks he can tote it around here and force us to take it. At this point since the folks in charge can't seem to fucking understand that we've taken it into our own hands, we simply want it gone. We didn't start this, but we will finish it, tonight preferably, without reversal, compromise, or exception.

 

I understand completely, what I don't get is how 300 other people in the community see the same shit you do everyday, yet they don't make a problem out of it.

 

You are the most pro-dictatorship bastard I have met today, you are insinuating that steamgamers should stop a person from talking about anything furry, wow. While the furry thing is causing alot of drama banning anything furry related in their profile or posts is just going to cause more drama and is borderline idiotic.

I agree with the last sentence, completely, if you fucking think about it for a second, maybe its not the pictures on the avatar and signature that's causing flame, its more of the people who are instigating it, making a big deal out of it that are causing it.