Petition - Ban against Furry/Porn

[Lux]

That has nothing to do with it. Furry shit was an issue before, and alot of members got pissed, the said furries took their shit down, that was the end of it. That is what we want, no more, no less. The shitbag in question though just feeds off this.

 

Anything which is furry that like usual nude is too revealing has always been punishable.

 

But pictures of cartoon animals that aren't revealing?? If these aren't the pictures in question and it is infact revealing furry that is then the argument is already decided.....revealing porn is a bannable offence.

 

However if you don't like furry which isn't revealing, I see no reason why this should carry a ban.

 

Your opinion is yours to have, there are things on here that I object to but if there is so REAL issue with it on this forum then I get over it, and I think anyone who has a disgust for unrevealing cartoon animals should too, although as I've stressed several times....I don't see how anything more then this is even needs a thread.

 

Here lets stop the theoretical shit Lux. Longwave and Kenny are fine. I'm not even offended by them in the slightest. Church is a fucking piece of trash, NOT because of his obsession with Fur, but because he thinks he can tote it around here and force us to take it. At this point since the folks in charge can't seem to fucking understand that we've taken it into our own hands, we simply want it gone. We didn't start this, but we will finish it, tonight preferably, without reversal, compromise, or exception.

 

I agree, but I don't think the measures this thread are suggesting are needed.

 

Say if I was gay, am I allowed to have homosexual men kissing in my avatar and signature, or is that pushing it upon people?

What if two erotic men were holding hands?

Sucking a lolipop in a curious stance?

 

I don't think this is really a big deal if you are ready to accept what may follow with this, because this is beyond a cartoon male fox and a cartoon female fox snuggling with nothing revealing (anything too revealing as has always been with porn is bannable already)

 

No one who is gay in this community has really pushed anything like this. Sure be gay and proud if you are......but there's no point in putting it out there on purpose to draw attention.......if you then can't accept that some people won't like it and will be annoyed with your persistence to draw attention then you are the problem.

[Kennith]

As for the no posting bullshit on this topic, again the little people who are on defense have yet again been stripped away from their voice, they apparently have no say in this.

[PotshotPolka]

Don't get me wrong, I am all for removing furry content to ever be placed on the site, but IMO it seems you all just need something to bash on, something to flame on, I'm sure after its removed you'll find something else.

 

Then we agree, there are shitbags here who feed on conflict, and they're on either side of the argument. If you really think this then why didn't you act after we put up a logical, civil, and proactive argument, instead of just locking it without results?

[Kennith]

Then we agree, there are shitbags here who feed on conflict, and they're on either side of the argument. If you really think this then why didn't you act after we put up a logical, civil, and proactive argument, instead of just locking it without results?

 

Because I wasn't a BD back then, duh?

[SoulKeeper]

As for the no posting bullshit on this topic, again the little people who are on defense have yet again been stripped away from their voice, they apparently have no say in this.

 

I haven't nerd raged about anyone posting their comments.

I've asked those near the beginning to stop, but you can't say I'm attacking the little people. Those who I asked to stop near the beginning were all for this petition and supporting it 100%.

 

edit: Topic's been edited so we can continue our peaceful argument and so others may join in.

[PotshotPolka]

Because I wasn't a BD back then, duh?

 

A week ago? I thought you promoted by then.

 

Besides that then, if you agree to these terms can you then formally give Church a warning for this, and then act accordingly if he doesn't?

[Kennith]

I haven't nerd raged about anyone posting their comments.

I've asked those near the beginning to stop, but you can't say I'm attacking the little people. Those who I asked to stop near the beginning were all for this petition and supporting it 100%.

 

That's because the ones supporting it, is already in the upperhand, nothing really much to say here. This whole topic is just a whole lot of baised.

[Lux]

I think that the frustration of nothing happening in Potshot's previous thread which I think was correct and needed backing as there was a big problem has lead to this which is an even bigger ask and over the line I think.

 

Most of the sensible and higher up people here share the same goal so hopefully we can just get rid of whoever is giving furries a bad name which was always the primary goal.

[PotshotPolka]

That's because the ones supporting it, is already in the upperhand, nothing really much to say here. This whole topic is just a whole lot of baised.

 

I'm not biased. I do not condone majority rules. Nothing I have said is illogical, and logic should decide action, not the number of hands raised.

[Kennith]

I'm not biased. I do not condone majority rules. Nothing I have said is illogical, and logic should decide action, not the number of hands raised.

 

A week ago? I thought you promoted by then.

 

Besides that then, if you agree to these terms can you then formally give Church a warning for this, and then act accordingly if he doesn't?

I've only just gotten it, I've been busy as well since I've had a CFT, after Slavic was banned, that is when I actually started doing BD work. I can give Church a warning, and will act accordingly, however the way some people have been acting to new people to the community who happened to let everyone know he's a furry, its like saying, "look, that guy's black, lets go pick on him" Of course, this is just an analogy. I think the way it is now is fine, no furry PORN. But you are allowed to have it somewhat to an extent, like what KennyG has. Cause if you want to limit this, you are going to have to limit everything else. If you haven't noticed this is a lot similar to the Jen posting penis sprays on the servers because others are posting vaginas. If you want to limit this then you are going to have to limit girls posing on avatars and sprays. Its only fair.

 

Then because of one person's action why do you think it's best to limit it for everyone else who hasn't really done anything in the wrong, such as Longwave and KennyG.