Jump to content

? servers

? players online

3 people you would unban from SG

Recommended Posts


  • Content Count:  3791
  • Joined:  08/08/09
  • Status:  Offline

So we ban in anticipation?

 

But he wasn't. He was banned for a lot of things... And we would of continued if he wasn't stopped is what I was meant to say.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  4198
  • Joined:  03/23/08
  • Status:  Offline

So we ban in anticipation?

It was out of the blue Dirty being banned, but he bloody well deserved it for what he had done, and what he would of done.

Tweezy mentioned it more as secondary reasoning rather than the prime one.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  2095
  • Joined:  07/05/08
  • Status:  Offline

If you knew exactly what they had done, then you would think differently ;)

 

It was out of the blue Dirty being banned, but he bloody well deserved it for what he had done, and what he would of done.

 

Do you know what he did?

 

He trolled other servers and recorded people raging on our servers, half the time he didn't even provoke these people.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

  • Content Count:  3073
  • Joined:  01/28/08
  • Status:  Offline

Do you know what he did?

 

He trolled other servers and recorded people raging on our servers, half the time he didn't even provoke these people.

 

He recorded himself griefing on our servers. That and enough Hacking bans in the last several months across the board prompted us to act. Simple enough. Then he got caught here. I'd say more, but the case isnt closed.

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  4685
  • Joined:  03/26/08
  • Status:  Offline

He recorded himself griefing on our servers. That and enough Hacking bans in the last several months across the board prompted us to act. Simple enough. Then he got caught here. I'd say more, but the case isnt closed.

 

Not like this had been going on for ages before you guys decided to do anything.:ohwell:

Link to comment

  • Content Count:  1752
  • Joined:  10/26/08
  • Status:  Offline

Tweezy mentioned it more as secondary reasoning rather than the prime one.

 

The wording was a little weird. It seemed like it was a combination of the two.

 

and also, considering most everyone wants him back, he couldn't have been too bad.

Link to comment

Reply to Thread

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...