Breblo Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 20 Joined: 10/31/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 Or maybe CT's cannot camp unless he is the LAST CT and more then 3 other T's are alive. Quote Link to comment
Jaffa Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 4263 Joined: 09/18/07 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 I don't enforce it (or nearly any) To be honest, nearly every PB rule is conditional, its not exact as yay or nay Quote Link to comment
mapper Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 1563 Joined: 08/03/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 Support for the "reword". Quote Link to comment
Breblo Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 20 Joined: 10/31/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 good choice Quote Link to comment
Cookie Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 636 Joined: 01/02/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 (edited) I think the rule of warning shots should be "Warning shots are required for non rebelling actions" example = falling of big cage, not crouching in the beginning of the round, not crouch walking. If they fall off big cage running towards a CT, kill him, but if he immediately tries to get back on, that's a warning shot. Honestly, do you want to die for running for a split second when the cells open, and then crouching because the orders weren't clear? I play both T and CT and I think the warning shot rule is fine, just needs to be reworded. Keep it. 1 Quote Edited December 21, 2009 by Cookie Link to comment
Neo Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 446 Joined: 11/01/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 Add it, the remove it, the add it again and oh wait let's take it off. what the fuck How about you listen to the community before you add it then ? When it was added about 75% of the community was against it. 2 Quote Link to comment
Kiwi Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 1324 Joined: 07/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 *Support* But to be honest I hate SG's PB all together. Especially since you don't even have to have a mic to be on CT! Quote Link to comment
Neo Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 446 Joined: 11/01/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 *Support* But to be honest I hate SG's PB all together. Especially since you don't even have to have a mic to be on CT! So you mean that we should force people who want to be CT to go buy a mic ? Quote Link to comment
Huwajux Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 4198 Joined: 03/23/08 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 Warning shots at the moment are a fail-safe. Without warning shots people used to take advantage of it by telling the terrorists to go somewhere and then killing them if they so much as looked in a different direction. The admins couldn't do anything about it because being a nazi-guard wasn't against the rules. Just play the damn game, if a terrorist is being a bitchy little asshole and spouting "YOU DIDN'T GIVE ME A WARNING SHOT", then just kill him. For example, if all Ts are told to go to the cage and one runs in a completely different direction then that is kill worthy. However I'll stand for the rule as it prevents assholes killing Ts for looking in a different direction. 2 Quote Link to comment
MrGall Posted December 21, 2009 Content Count: 358 Joined: 11/05/07 Status: Offline Share Posted December 21, 2009 reward Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread