Appealing Bans Suggestion

[Noxstar]

I asked in staff discord whether the "Additional Information" part of the Ban Appeal Section should be reworded and discussion followed up so I just want to hear other people's thoughts on this. A lot of people misinterpret the Additional Information and it's something that needs to change since the idea over "Why should I be unbanned" isn't in a lot of people's mind even before creating an appeal for some reason.

 

*Some thoughts on the issue*

 

@crazedkangaroo, Dom, Chad, and I - "I think Additional Information is fine given the context and an additional question of "Why should you be unbanned?" is the way to go"

 

@Takuto - "You can just put under additional information 1 or two more questions trying to help the person give more detail about the whole thing"

 

@Dom - "i think most people see “additional information” as what they got banned for rather than why they should be unbanned. I don't see a problem with adding an extra question"

 

Any other opinions?

[Tyymunk]

I personally appreciate the system we have now as it thins out the retards who are incapable of making the connection to additional information and why they got banned and why they should be unbanned.

[Bondairy]

Most of the people who make ban appeals put in little too no effort in the first place but for the ones who have some brain cells this would be a good idea so they can justify their thinking or ask questions too the person who banned them or the person reviewing the case.

[crazedkangaroo]

This change has been implemented.