Caution Posted March 18, 2013 Content Count: 11501 Joined: 10/19/08 Status: Offline Share Posted March 18, 2013 Or we could have set standards, but the final decision is left to AO+, that way not as many dumb asses get through. Link to comment
Sleggie Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 940 Joined: 12/22/12 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Or we could have set standards, but the final decision is left to AO+, that way not as many dumb asses get through. Yeah, that's better. Link to comment
Tyler Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 1590 Joined: 06/06/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Having standards or helping towards the community would be the only way I would see HG even remotely working again. Having a poll and letting the community choose would just make it a popularity contest and wouldn't exactly be "honorable". Link to comment
Paralyzed Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 3728 Joined: 10/14/07 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Having standards or helping towards the community would be the only way I would see HG even remotely working again. Having a poll and letting the community choose would just make it a popularity contest and wouldn't exactly be "honorable". What this wise man said. Link to comment
floffypus Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 5063 Joined: 02/25/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 I remember being a HG, if i remember correctly it was 500+ posts that was required. - 1k posts - 2-3 years in the cmmunity - 100 hours on our servers - and being chosen by higher ups Not everyone is so active on the forum but are well known by a lot of people so 2k+ posts my be a little too much to require in my opinion. But im all for bringing it back! Link to comment
BlackWhite Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 2262 Joined: 02/05/12 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Or the honorable title should given for those who ACTUALLY done and contribute something for the Steamgamer, and well known by the players/admins/AO+ Regardless of his/her post count, playing time and/or how many years in community. Why not make it special O_o? Link to comment
Neptune Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 1513 Joined: 10/03/11 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Why not make it a ribbon? Link to comment
Zaraki Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 4960 Joined: 10/28/09 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Hmmmm just make the min reqs and if the person can apply for the title, let the CA's decide if the player deserves it or not in the end. Link to comment
HZK Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 2553 Joined: 08/29/10 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Hmmmm just make the min reqs and if the person can apply for the title, let the CA's decide if the player deserves it or not in the end. Best system for the HG title that has been suggested, IMO. Link to comment
Sleggie Posted March 19, 2013 Content Count: 940 Joined: 12/22/12 Status: Offline Share Posted March 19, 2013 Having standards or helping towards the community would be the only way I would see HG even remotely working again. Having a poll and letting the community choose would just make it a popularity contest and wouldn't exactly be "honorable". I totally agree. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread