FLuiD

i luv u

im dumb

wait did you just change that or has it been that way? cause I will feel stupid if it's always been that way. If it hasn't though, this is definitely much better, thanks

realized i was retarded so this post is pointless

I think this would be a good replacement for the matchbox. Matchbox really isn't very practical hence the reason it's not used

46

the suckling of young

o shit

im famous I dont associate with any of you fuck ass basic plebs anymore

what about letting the community test maps on a certain day/week and having them vote? I feel like that would be better, but either way it should still be a fun contest

+1 this, it's super annoying

lies. we need to organize a competition and have the community decide

26

Africa: 1 "Well shit, that's pretty cool." *Clicks the one* Dominic God damnit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cr6zQLvPMpw

In the first situation, you should probably slay yourself unless you talk to the person and they are ok with you not slaying. If you accidentally kill an inno while an admin is on, I would recommend you talk to the admin and either A) Have them slay you or do whatever is necessary or B) Have a clear understanding with the admin that you will slay/punish yourself. I personally would suggest you go with option A as it leaves little (if any) room for any further conflict or misunderstanding.

k

I warn against it too. Just because it's a work around doesn't make it any less racist or meaningful

I keep trying but it won't work ;-;

http://www.funmag.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/funny-looking-people-15-photos-05.jpg

I don't think we have enough to completely shut down the idea instantly

can we just make this a traitor weapon with like 2 bullets or something

1) EVERYBODY EVER should always be able to give their thoughts and vote on an applicant no matter what. You can't just shut down a group of people YOU feel are inadequate. This is why we have a buffer (BD's making the call in the end) from the public directly determining the outcome through popular vote. 2) It isn't,and should never, be up to you to make the decision that someones thoughts are invalid due to circumstances upon which they are made. For example, if someone says "i don't like them because they did this a few months ago," it is not up to you to say their thought/feeling is invalid because it was made on what you think is not an acceptable experience to use in a certain situation (like something that happened months ago). 3) Never make an assumption of how someone's opinion was formed 4) Kind of goes with point 3, don't assume someone is bandwagon-ing or their final vote was made the way it was because everyone else influenced them. First of all, it isn't necessarily bandwagon-ing if someone changes their mind because everyone else went against them. It is completely normal and OK for someone to change their mind based on what others have to say (I mean, that's how the BD's decide who to pick right? They make their decision based on what the community has to say in addition to their own beliefs). Secondly, everybody has a reason to vote the way they do. If they truly 100% thought an applicant deserved either a re-apply, abstain, or support, they would pick that decision in the end. If their decision changes based on others, that means there is at least SOME sliver of a doubt in what they believe, and that alone provides BD's with a massively improved sense of the entirety of the application.

I don't really feel like writing an entire long paragraph, so I'll just say this. I think you are overstating/exaggerating the issue too much (for the "issues" that are actually REAL issues that is). It is easy to see one thing that's out of the ordinary and get into a mindset where everything you see acts as an example in your head to further prove the point you are trying to sell yourself on. Like I said, some of the things you talked about aren't actually issues at all, but rather normal occurrences that will ALWAYS occur naturally. Of all the things you talked about, I only really agree on the idea of disallowing voters/commenters of apps to see the responses of other people.

When you go to a cardinals game to watch them beat dat ass and get the wildcard but then they don't get the wildcard after beating dat ass 10-4