Benzene

sounds fun

Yeah, I completely agree with this, and that's mainly why I suggested that it be allowed only after a certain time has passed in a round, or maybe even if there's less than 3 CTs it gets activated or something. But I am also concerned about the exploits that could arise from this.

I actually got this idea because a certain administrator (who shall remain unnamed) put a beacon on me in Jailbreak and I died because of it. This got me to thinking that what if players could vote to set a beacon on a specific player? I know that this is a thing that is enabled for SA's, but it's incredibly useful whenever there are CTs that are camping, especially when they are the last ones left. I've had many experiences in Jailbreak where last CTs have camped vents, armory, or some secrets and although there are people telling them to stop camping/delaying/not enforcing, they remain put and it takes time for them to be found. I also know that there are ways to abuse this, and I am hoping some discussion can be generated about this idea. It's a very rough idea, and there are a lot of flaws that could be found, but I think this could be something that Jailbreak had. Here's how I envisioned it would go. After a certain amount of time (say when there are 2:00 left in the round), the !votebeacon or !beacon command is enabled. There, CTs or Ts can type that and select the player who they want a beacon on. Then, a vote would be initiated and with a certain percentage of votes, a beacon could be placed on that player. Looking forward to hearing people's thoughts on this.

one thing I actually find pretty easy to do is just use the steam screenshot feature. In CS:GO the hot key is F12, and once you take it the SS appears in your in game summary. Once you post it publicly, you can upload it to your steam account and from there generate a link to access it. It's what I do for all my player complaints, and although it does take about 30-45seconds to complete, I haven't had any problems with it whatsoever.

I know that I already pitched in somewhat to this thread, but I'm going to do it again. I think that if the team here at SG can implement an !order or !o command which limits abusive powers, it would cause A LOT less headaches. However, I do see many instances where this can be abused by CTs. But anything to get away from bickering about "stop conflicting" "stop revoking my order" et al. One suggestion I have is to definitely have a cool down feature with this. Maybe only let people use it once per round (like fo is limited with a cool down per rounds), or maybe have a cool down between when !o can be used (such as like 30 seconds so Ts can actually execute the order).

This is about to be epic. I'm going to target @RaZ4 Panda because he's a little bitch boy and he's my boyfriend.

I don't really think that adding a bomb death would do anything except make the CTs more likely to run further away faster. I feel like there aren't really too many baiters on retakes anyways, and this really isn't that big of a problem. But I do agree that the KDR is not really necessary, and not too many people would be heavily opposed to it being taken away.

golden retrievers are the tastiest.

: (

you should start a skyblock world with me error

Yo admins are you sure that promoting 20 scrolls to Modding Team was the best idea? I'm not sure that he is the best candidate for this position, maybe we should wait until he actually speaks before allowing him in a position of authority. All jokes aside, congrats @20 scrolls, may your maps be not absolutely garbage in every way, shape, and form.

nah they're cutting off the last couple of topics from most ap exams, as well as shortening test times.

Name: benzene Subjects: Chemistry, English (papers and books), Latin, History (American or World) Availability: I am free all day, every day for the next 2-3 weeks, so just hit me up any time and I can help you. For a stricter time range, I will always be available from 2-10pm EST (weekdays and weekends). I can also help tutor and study for the SAT (charge-free, of course). I also have like 70 ACT exams, just ask and you can have them. I am currently a junior in high school, but I am knowledgeable about many subjects and I like to think that I am a good tutor. I can proof-read or peer-edit papers, and can do other things as well. discord: benzene#6302

joining the steam-gamers community.

I think this idea has been said before, and might possibly currently be under review or is currently being implemented, but I just think that it would be really cool to have T Ranks as well as CT Ranks in JB. It could be based off points, or time played, and could go from maybe prisoner to gang leader to maybe like crime lord or something like that.

rip overkill

https://medal.tv/clips/17555555/d1337EFuwoFQ

This has probably already been discussed a lot, but is there any plan / idea to create an SG app? It could have like the features of the forum and the website and such, but accessible from a mobile device. I think that would be a really cool thing to have.

Hey guys. I've noticed that some of the recent posts have been a bit serious, and I just wanted to share with y'all a funny clip I recorded while I was playing wingman. Can you spot the guy at 1:47? https://medal.tv/clips/17255502/d1337i1OsuX0

I'm so sorry to hear that Larry. My thoughts and prayers go out to that kid's family as well.

Incredibly late to the gravy train, but still wanted to voice my congratulations. You deserve this @Infinityward, and I'd like to thank you for your helpful contributions.

I agree with jmc in that we should definitely have T ranks to accompany the CTRanks. If we could have T ranks such as prisoner, rebeller, crime lord or something cool like that, I think that it would benefit the people who mainly play T side (such as those who are in gangs and are trying to get as many gang points as possible).

If you're talking about the tag that appears before your name when you type in chat, do !settag and it will bring up a list of colors, as well as give you the option to change your tag.

@TheZZL mentioned this before - if there is a rebeller, and you are standing right next to that rebeller, the chances of you getting shot increase dramatically. The best option for a T in that situation is just to move away, and sacrifice a little bit of hp for a warning shot. Crossfiring is a rule because it allows for a CT to confidently shoot at and try to eliminate a rebeller without having to worry about accidentally damaging the wrong person.

If a CT sees a T disobey an order, and instead of warning shotting them, accidentally kills them with one shot, are they required to slay? I looked through the rules and I didn't see anything that related to a CT being required to slay after an accidental freekill. There's no mention of freekilling at all.