Yang Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 729 Joined: 02/26/17 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 so is it freekill if a CT spray into a crowd of T's with one T firing at them with an AK? forgot to add that all T's were stacked Link to comment
Bacon Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 701 Joined: 11/15/18 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 (edited) If someone is a t is shooting from a crowd of t's and the ct sprays into the crowd to kill the t and kills like 3-4 people without killing the guy shooting than just that guy its considered freekill but if the ct kills the guy shooting and accidentally shoots a person while shooting the t its crossfire. 2 Edited June 13, 2019 by Bacon Link to comment
Error. Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 1103 Joined: 01/03/19 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 (edited) its considered crossfire, at least I do if its like in a crowd of 4-5 Ts but a giant crowd of them of like 8-10 Ts I consider that FK EDIT: Bacon makes a good point about spraying, spraying is overtop and would be considered FK but most people just tap instead of spray EDIT 2: (talking about what you added) yes that would be FK since like 3/4 of the Ts would die 1 Edited June 13, 2019 by Error. Link to comment
TheZZL Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 3294 Joined: 10/28/18 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 its considered crossfire Crossfire, but bullshit. You're right though, they're spared of consequences most of the time 1 Link to comment
Toasty Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 430 Joined: 01/04/19 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 To be honest, most of the time, people spray into crowds, leisurely taking 3-4 bystanders along with the shooter and use "crossfire" as an excuse to get away with it. There's nothing we can do in those situations most of the time because after all, they're trying to kill the rebellers. And I agree, it does tend to get excessive, but again, there's not much we can do against it. 3 Link to comment
Kicks Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 391 Joined: 12/24/16 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 To be honest, most of the time, people spray into crowds, leisurely taking 3-4 bystanders along with the shooter and use "crossfire" as an excuse to get away with it. There's nothing we can do in those situations most of the time because after all, they're trying to kill the rebellers. And I agree, it does tend to get excessive, but again, there's not much we can do against it. Situations like this should not be allowed, imo. If someone is gonna get lazy with their aim and spray stacks of Ts, killing them and free-damaging them, then they should be swapped from CT at the very least as they have been proven unable to control themselves whilst on CT. 1 Link to comment
TheZZL Posted June 13, 2019 Content Count: 3294 Joined: 10/28/18 Status: Offline Share Posted June 13, 2019 Situations like this should not be allowed, imo. If someone is gonna get lazy with their aim and spray stacks of Ts, killing them and free-damaging them, then they should be swapped from CT at the very least as they have been proven unable to control themselves whilst on CT. I wish it could be like that, but it doesn't. Most of the people that do that are the kill hungry CT's that know the rules. They want to boost their ego and generally, that's okay (Shooting the stack). 1 Link to comment
thump Posted June 15, 2019 Content Count: 272 Joined: 09/02/18 Status: Offline Share Posted June 15, 2019 Just 1 tap the guy with the gun lmao 1 Link to comment
roux Posted June 15, 2019 Content Count: 2579 Joined: 02/27/16 Status: Offline Share Posted June 15, 2019 I really don't see how you can reasonably argue with the "crossfire" call in such a situation. There's no way in hell you're in the obligation to obliterate 4 Ts to get a single one. While it remains very situatuonal, no, this would not be considered crossfire; that's you intentionally sacrificing 4 players to stop 1. You can usually easily take cover, order Ts to move and deal with said rebeller in a reasonable way. Unless the ATs of the server have drastically changed their stances on the matter, that is. 1 Link to comment
delirium Posted June 15, 2019 Content Count: 5381 Joined: 03/10/09 Status: Offline Share Posted June 15, 2019 I really don't see how you can reasonably argue with the "crossfire" call in such a situation. There's no way in hell you're in the obligation to obliterate 4 Ts to get a single one. While it remains very situatuonal, no, this would not be considered crossfire; that's you intentionally sacrificing 4 players to stop 1. You can usually easily take cover, order Ts to move and deal with said rebeller in a reasonable way. Unless the ATs of the server have drastically changed their stances on the matter, that is. With the addition of no block to the server I can very much see how you could consider it crossfire. While the take cover scenario you presented is plausible, not everyone is going to have the presence of mind to be able to do that. I think on some level it's just a natural reaction to try and stop the offending T as quickly as possible and while no block is necessary on a server of our size it also presents issues such as this. At the end of the day as long as it's not occurring consistently I think that people caught in a bad spot should just shake it off and chalk it up to that's how it is sometimes. If you're crying over an occasional freekill then you probably shouldn't be playing the game mode. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Reply to Thread