CS:GO Administrator
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Poobah

Recent Profile Visitors

1157 profile views
  1. In-game name: [SG] Poobah Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:68397358 Time for submission: 55:37 Screenshot of time(s): https://imgur.com/xJYfFpt Video Submission (Optional): Due to a severe lack of submissions, I will submit my time(s) this time around.
  2. We recently had a chat about why this happens in the Discord and the reason that you get the error is because the map is over 150MB (which you already know). So, the work around on the client side is the "-maxdownloadfilesizemb x" as mentioned, but if the map is put into the fastdl instead of bzip2 everyone will be able to download it regardless of size and no one will have to do "-maxdownloadfilesizemb x" as a work around. so basically, it should be fixed soon, theres just a few maps that are over 150MB that arent on the fastdl and we've been working on identifying them and putting them where they should be, so thanks for letting us know
  3. Just edit this post and remove the things that have been fixed/addressed and I'll edit it to add more issues as they're found - cement bonus 5 has no end zone - cement bonus 4 end zone extends beyond the end platform (so it can be completed without landing on the platform) --- I tested this and can't seem to replicate it. Are you sure it's B4? - Dreamz - cement has 7 bonuses, so 2 of them are not zoned --- One of them doesn't work correctly so I placed a teleporter back to spawn in front of the warp - Dreamz - adventure_easy is currently a tier 2 map but it should be at least tier 4 --- It is set to T2 in the map cycle but it is a Tier 4 on the server. I need to work on the UMC and make sure all the map tiers and descriptions line up. - Dreamz - summit has 2 unzoned bonuses - whiteout has a stage 7 start zone at the beginning of stage 2, theres only 6 stages. --- Still trying to figure this one out. Gonna disable this map for a while until I can figure it out. - Dreamz - the nomination list seems to disappear really fast regardless of how long its set to stay up for, so if it could just stay open until the player closes it themselves i think thatd work better - 25_lighters is currently a tier 3 map but it should be a tier 4 - missing map error for surf_axil --- I think this may be an issue on your end. The server has the .bsp and the .nav uploaded. Go to your maps folder in your CSGO directory and delete surf_axil, if it's there and then it should redownload next time you play it.
  4. Yeah I'd have to agree with Matty, at least from a competitive standpoint. If the prespeed is near or above the speed at which you can leave the start zone while prestrafing it lowers the skill ceiling a bit since you can just bhop at the start to get the same effect. So, ideally (or at least my preference would be), the prespeed would be 300 so that someone prestrafing has an advantage since its a skill that has to be learned and incorporated into your play. I think 350 would also work, but definitely no higher than that since the max prestrafe is roughly around 400 or so (only turned on the prestrafe option for a minute, so this could be inaccurate, its probably a little more). Basically, in a competitive scenario, you'd want prestrafing to have an advantage over bhopping, in my opinion
  5. While I understand that this is a temporary thing, I do have a few issues with it. If I want to play any map above t3 I literally have to go to another server to play it. So while there aren't as many experienced players as there are new, I still think that no t4+ could drive off a small part of the player base. I can see a few ways that this could go and the first is something like having t4+ nominations disappear after there are more than 2 or 3 players on the server. I was really only able to play so many of the higher tier maps because at times I was the only person on so I could pick whatever map I wanted, so I think that in a scenario where there are 2 or 3 experienced players who do want to play a harder map they should be able to do so. The second scenario, which, however likely, would be the best option in my opinion, would be to be a second server for t4+. This is pretty standard for most other server networks, but that, of course, doesn't mean it works for us. Activity would likely be low, there's the in-joke of "do we have enough money for another server", along with other myths and misinformation, but I think it's at least worth a try for a while to see if our overall surf population increases.
  6. Poobah


    I found that if you are to multiply your current percent complete by 1.74 then you should have a rough estimate of what your percentage would be if it were working (This does not take into account the maps that have been added since the percentages broke, so it's probably around 1.65x, give or take, also I wouldn't use this as proof for a surf reward request).
  7. I've given this some thought and if I understand what you're saying correctly, which is that you don't want to remove database entries because it would get rid of the saved times for the map when the map might come back, then I think it would actually be a good idea to remove the map from the database. If a map has to be removed in the first place its probably because it's not working as intended, so if the times that are set on a map that isn't working as intended are kept after the map has been fixed then I think that could lead to some problems such as unbeatable times. Essentially, times set on a broken map shouldn't be kept if the map is then fixed (unless a broken map always yields a slower time vs a fixed map, but in many cases this would not be true). So an example would be that a start zone extends farther into a map than it should before a fix and then after the fix it is where its intended but gives pre-fix times an edge. Checkpoints not working could allow for someone to take a shorter route than intended which wouldn't be beatable after they are added back in a fix. Boosts often do not work as intended so you'll get a boost that gives twice as much speed as it should (though this is mainly the fault of the boost, not much can be done about it). Now I'm not familiar with the behind the scenes work and what not so I don't know if it would be a lot more work or more annoying than it needs to be, but I think that a good way to go about adding or removing maps from the database would just be to remove the map from the database if it isn't on the server. This would allow for the percentage complete to be accurate and would remove any possibility of unbeatable holdover times, as mentioned.
  8. Ah, you right. I forgot about that. Thought it was something on our end.
  9. Date: 6/13/20 Map: Server wide Bug/Glitch: https://imgur.com/a/uxJ8bi8 The "nager" in "AFK Manager" is censored Also, the percentage of maps complete still does not appear to be working correctly, I believe the problem was that both the .bsp and .nav files were being read instead of only the .bsp files which effectively doubles the number of "maps" on the server Additional Information: A few minor suggestions that I'll just put here instead of making a separate post: When nominating a map, the nomination list seems to go away/time out rather quick, like several seconds, if you don't choose a map or go to the next page, so if it could just stay up for like 10 or 15 seconds before timing out that'd be nice Some of the phrases that the server says, one of which is in the above photo, are a little odd to me or could be misinterpreted. The one in the photo says "Tired of your boring skins?" which I guess just seems a little rude or insulting? I dunno, just seems weird, like, "Let's not kid ourselves you ain't got any good skins, just do !ws and get yourself a karambit." Might just be me tho The other is when the server says "Please check out our Discord server (Discord link)" and I guess the problem I have with this one is that it says "please"? Just seems a bit out of place, like we really want you to join our Discord server for some inauthentic reason instead of you wanting to join it for yourself? I dunno man, maybe it's just me
  10. the spawn starting with -2043.92 is the one outside b tuns that is completely stuck if the b tuns spawn were at -1988.77 461.25 75.63 it would work better y axis - from a site down long to pit is moving negative b site to ct spawn is moving positive the spawns starting at x axis (give or take 1 or 2 units, not always the same, probably because i tried to move not think i would be stuck): -489.97 inside mid doors next to b tuns entrance 1562 in the corner of the map opposite goose 116.02 near T spawn against building -684.48 literally t spawn, stuck in the curb/sidewalk 1300.08 crates on slope on a site -1331.95 also outside of b tuns on the t spawn side, opposite the spawn that gets you completely stuck -84.03 t spawn against building 1227.97 1054.43 goose -342.03 on ct side of mid doors against left door in corner -818.58 also t spawn but in the ground i guess 2094.00 behind box to watch tuns on b site 1768.47 boxes at the end of long, pit side, below steps to platform over pit are ones that i have had trouble with getting temp stuck will update soon also theres a problem with shadows not disappearing
  11. Another thing I’ve noticed is that with 20 players on the server there is a noticeable frame rate difference. I’ve noticed this before when playing workshop maps (prefire practice maps of official maps) with a lot of bots and it is a problem here, too. Now, I don’t have a god tier PC or anything but I also don’t have a pile of garbage. So, while there are 20 or so players on I get about 80-100 FPS where with 16 or so I believe I got about 120/130. If there were 24 or so players on at once I feel that my frames would drop to a point that would be visibly noticeable. I understand that as a server manager you want to do the best you can for the server and want to see it prosper, but I feel like the negatives significantly outweigh the positives in regards to player slots on the FFA server. I think 20 slots would be plenty for a FFA server, and if something like more spawns are needed I could go around the map and suggest some more, or get the coords of the bad spawns and post them here (along with coords of the same spawn but like half a step away from the thing that the player is getting stuck in) if that would be helpful.
  12. After playing for about 30 minutes there are some things that need to be addressed. Firstly, the current amount of player slots is just too many. Even when it was limited to 16 you would still have players spawn near or on you and get shot from the back or side a lot of the time, now it is even worse, and you get double or triple peeked quite often with players almost always spawning in your immediate vicinity. I believe there were 18+ players on at this time. The invincibility after spawning is 2 seconds. This is rather long for immunity, I feel, as it gives you time to walk around and look for targets and line up shots, only losing invincibility after 2 seconds or shooting your weapon. There is a spawn outside of B tunnels on the T side where you are stuck in the wall. Many of the other spawns will also partially have you spawn in a wall which temporarily prevents you from moving and also ruins your accuracy. After you kill a player it says "You killed him." (lol) I think it'd be better if it said the name of the player you killed. Upon shooting and damaging a player you get instant updates on their health, which basically tells you if you landed your shot and, if using an AWP, if you should switch to your pistol to finish the player off. Just feels like to much info to me. I think it would be better to say how much health the player had when they killed you. When doing !guns, the option for number 5 is the P90. I feel like the AUG would be a better option on the first page what with the new meta and all. Edit III: Forgot about GameMe points showing when you get kill or are killed. Personally I like seeing if I'm gaining points. If this point system is still being used I think it'd be good to have it show, or at least be able to have the visuals be toggled on or off. @Fuze
  13. Well before the list starts I'll just say that classics2 is currently on 8000 (eight thousand) max velocity for some reason which makes stage 8, which was previously mentioned, very difficult because you can not turn at a reasonable rate or control yourself at that speed. In order to beat it you must deliberately slow yourself down, which, as mentioned, is bad. I am not sure if the current record takes advantage of the 8k cap but I would imagine so, so I'm not sure if the time(s) would need to be deleted if this were the case or what the proper course of action would be. I've gone through the list of my completed and incomplete maps so that should cover pretty much all current maps on the server, the list also shows maps that are not on the server and there are several duplicates, so if I come across a map that needs or could use a 5k velocity cap I will report back here. The list of maps that need or could use 5k velocity cap are: - surf_me (required to beat bonus 4) - surf_fast (not sure if this is on the server currently because I remember that I had told Bread that something was wrong with the map because you couldn't make a jump on stage 2 possibly due a missing boost but you actually just need a 5k cap to beat it, didn't know that at the time, how foolish of me, map should work fine with 5k cap and can be re-added if not already on server) - surf_aircontrol (not needed but due to map relying purely on speed could be a nice change) - surf_leet_xl_beta7z (same as above) - surf_legends (same as above) Upon map change, it appears that, unless surf_spaceship is specified to have a 5k velocity cap (and I don't believe this to be the case), the server has changed to 5k max velocity. pls tell me that this is not the case thanks @nick
  14. Poobah

    surf. lag.

    no this should not be ignored it is a problem that needs to be addressed and fixed